The Monitor Model, developed by linguist Stephen Krashen, offers a comprehensive theory for second language acquisition (SLA). It suggests that successful language learning involves two main components: increasing exposure to the target language and ensuring proper error correction. According to Krashen, SLA occurs most effectively when learners are given sufficient and understandable input, corrected when necessary, and encouraged to feel comfortable with the language. The Monitor Model is built on five interconnected hypotheses that shape the way we acquire a second language: the Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis, the Monitor Hypothesis, the Natural Order Hypothesis, the Input Hypothesis, and the Affective Filter Hypothesis.
The Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis
The Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis posits that there are two distinct processes for acquiring a second language: acquisition and learning. Acquisition is subconscious, similar to how children naturally pick up their first language without explicitly studying its rules. Learning, on the other hand, is conscious and involves understanding the grammatical rules of a language. For example, when a person studies English in a classroom, they learn rules like subject-verb agreement. However, they only acquire the language when they are exposed to it naturally, through conversation or reading. Krashen argues that what is learned cannot be acquired, meaning that conscious learning can support, but not replace, the natural acquisition of a language.
The Natural Order Hypothesis
The Natural Order Hypothesis suggests that there is a predictable sequence in which grammatical structures are acquired in a second language. Some features, like plural forms (e.g., “cats”) or present continuous tense (e.g., “I am eating”), are usually acquired early, while others, like possessive “-s” or third-person singular “-s” (e.g., “he eats”), tend to come later. This order of acquisition is the same for both children and adults, regardless of their first language. Understanding this predictable pattern helps teachers know when to introduce specific grammar rules and structures.
The Monitor Hypothesis
The Monitor Hypothesis focuses on the role of conscious learning in language use. Krashen describes the “Monitor” as the internal editor that learners use to check their speech for errors before they speak or write. This editing process is most effective when three conditions are met: the learner must know the rule, be focused on correctness, and have time to make corrections. For example, if a learner is writing an essay in English, they can use their learned knowledge of grammar rules to review their writing. However, the Monitor is not always helpful in fast-paced conversations because there may not be enough time to apply it.
Krashen also notes that there is variation in how learners use the Monitor. Some learners, known as “over-users,” rely too heavily on conscious rules and may interrupt their communication to correct every small mistake. Others, known as “under-users,” either don’t use the Monitor or struggle to do so. Ideal language learners, called “optimal users,” are able to balance the use of the Monitor with natural communication. Individual factors, like personality, influence how often and effectively a learner uses the Monitor.
The Input Hypothesis
The Input Hypothesis emphasizes the importance of receiving comprehensible input—language that is slightly above the learner's current level of proficiency. According to Krashen, learners progress when they are exposed to language that is understandable but contains new language structures. For example, if a learner is at level “i,” they should be exposed to language at level “i+1.” The goal is not to force learners to understand every grammatical rule but to engage them in communication that they can follow with the help of context. This approach allows learners to acquire language naturally, as they are not explicitly taught each grammatical form. Over time, as they understand more input, their ability to produce language improves.
The Affective Filter Hypothesis
The Affective Filter Hypothesis deals with the emotional and psychological factors that affect language learning. According to this hypothesis, learners who are anxious, unmotivated, or lack self-confidence are less likely to successfully acquire a language. Krashen argues that learners have an “affective filter” that can either block or facilitate language acquisition. When learners are stressed or unsure of themselves, their filter is “up,” meaning that even if they understand the language they hear or read, the information does not reach their internal language learning system. When learners feel relaxed and motivated, their filter is “down,” and they can acquire language more effectively.
To lower the affective filter, it is essential to create a supportive learning environment. Teachers can help by allowing a “silent period,” where learners are not pressured to speak until they feel ready. It is also important for teachers to be mindful of the learner’s background and emotional state, as external factors, such as stress from adapting to a new culture or language, can affect language learning.
Conclusion
Krashen’s Monitor Model provides a detailed framework for understanding how we acquire a second language. By recognizing the importance of both unconscious and conscious learning, exposing learners to understandable input, and fostering a supportive and motivating environment, language teachers can help learners progress more effectively. Each of the five hypotheses—Acquisition-Learning, Natural Order, Monitor, Input, and Affective Filter—contributes to a better understanding of the factors that influence SLA. By taking these factors into account, learners and educators can create a more efficient and positive language learning experience.
No comments:
Post a Comment