Since the 1990s, Colombia has experienced profound social and educational transformations, particularly in how it conceives and implements foreign language education. The truth is that these legal and pedagogical advances have not only sought to align the national education system with global standards but also to empower Colombian learners to participate confidently and meaningfully in an increasingly interconnected world. In other words, language learning has come to represent more than a curricular goal—it has become a bridge toward global citizenship, intercultural understanding, and social mobility (MEN, 2006; Usma, 2009).
1. The
Legal Foundations of Foreign Language Education in Colombia
The
evolution of English language teaching in Colombia is deeply rooted in the
country’s legal framework. Law 115 of 1994, for instance, explicitly states
that one of the key objectives of elementary education is for students to “acquire
conversational and reading proficiency in at least one foreign language”
(Article 21, m). This early emphasis positions language learning as a
fundamental component of holistic human development rather than a luxury skill.
A few years
later, Resolution 2343 of 1996 expanded this vision by defining specific
curricular achievements for fifth-grade students. Among these, learners are
expected to recognize idiomatic expressions from various languages, interpret
meaning in short texts, and engage in simple communicative exchanges that
reflect real-life situations. The resolution emphasizes that language is not a
static set of rules but a living system through which children express
identity, curiosity, and creativity.
In
practice, this means teachers are encouraged to design classroom experiences
that connect English learning with students’ daily realities—simple dialogues
about family life, storytelling about local traditions, or even short
presentations about favorite activities. The goal is to make language use
authentic and emotionally engaging, helping learners see English as a tool for
connection rather than obligation (Richards, 2015).
2.
Building Communicative Competence: Standards and Subskills
The Basic
Standards of Competence in Foreign Languages: English (MEN, 2006) offer
concrete descriptors of what Colombian fifth graders should be able to do with
the language. These standards frame English not merely as a school subject, but
as a means of communication within and beyond the classroom. For example, by
the end of fifth grade, students should be able to understand short,
illustrated texts, participate in brief conversations using predictable
patterns, and speak about themselves and their routines using simple, connected
sentences.
Of course,
challenges remain. At this stage, learners may still rely on memorized phrases
or struggle with unfamiliar topics, but this is a natural part of the language
acquisition process. What matters most is the gradual expansion of confidence,
intelligibility, and fluency—what Canale and Swain (1980) would call communicative
competence. In addition, teachers must foster a supportive classroom
environment where errors are seen as steps toward mastery, not signs of
failure.
3.
Developing Subskills for Real Communication
To make
these standards actionable, the Ministry of National Education (MEN)
identifies a series of communicative subskills that guide teachers in planning
instruction. These subskills—linguistic, pragmatic, and
sociolinguistic—together form the foundation of meaningful communication.
For
example, fifth-grade students are expected to:
- Listen actively, following teachers and peers
during games and collaborative tasks (pragmatic and sociolinguistic
competences: listening).
- Recognize familiar words and
ideas in
short, descriptive texts (linguistic and pragmatic competences: listening).
- Use English intentionally, seeking opportunities to
apply what they know in classroom exchanges (sociolinguistic competence: speaking).
- Request clarification politely when they don’t understand
something (pragmatic competence).
- Engage in simple conversations, describing experiences or
recounting past events (linguistic and pragmatic competences: speaking).
- Read authentic texts, such as short passages about
cultural events like birthdays or Christmas (linguistic and
sociolinguistic competences: reading).
- Write simple sentences and
check spelling,
using familiar grammatical structures (linguistic and pragmatic
competences: writing).
In other
words, teachers are called to move beyond rote grammar instruction toward
creating communicative ecosystems—spaces where English is lived, not just
learned. Simple classroom strategies like using visuals, dramatizations, or
bilingual comparisons can make a profound difference in how students perceive
and retain language (Lightbown & Spada, 2013).
4.
Implications for Bilingual Educators
For
bilingual educators, these policies and standards are not bureaucratic
checklists; they are opportunities to translate policy into practice.
Teachers can integrate cultural exploration, storytelling, and experiential
learning into their lessons to promote not only linguistic skills but also
empathy, confidence, and intercultural competence.
The truth
is that when English becomes a bridge to understanding other ways of
life—rather than a barrier—students begin to see themselves as capable
participants in the world. Bilingual education, therefore, is not merely about
producing speakers of English; it is about nurturing thinkers and communicators
who can navigate and contribute to a multilingual, multicultural society.
References
Canale, M.,
& Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to
second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47.
Lightbown,
P. M., & Spada, N. (2013). How languages are learned (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Ministerio de
Educación Nacional (MEN). (2006). Estándares básicos de competencias en
lenguas extranjeras: Inglés. Bogotá, Colombia: MEN.
Richards,
J. C. (2015). Key issues in language teaching. Cambridge University
Press.
Usma, J.
(2009). Education and language policy in Colombia: Exploring processes of
inclusion, exclusion, and stratification in times of global reform. Profile Issues in Teachers' Professional
Development, 11(1), 123–142.
No comments:
Post a Comment